Ralph Nader, Tom Paine

Sup­pos­edly, polit­i­cally pro­gres­sive Amer­i­cans still need to decide whether or not to “for­give” Ralph Nader for “putting George W. Bush in the White House.” You know the idea: Nader went from being a tire­some and irrel­e­vant pub­lic fig­ure to being an out­right dam­ag­ing one by insist­ing upon run­ning for pub­lic office as a prin­ci­pled can­di­date, thereby split­ting the vote and keep­ing “real” and “viable” can­di­dates, like Al Gore and John Kerry, out of office.

Main­stream media—PBS and NPR included—either refuse to cover Nader or ridicule and vil­ify him—overtly or sub­tly. I’m sorry to say that the con­sis­tently dark propaganda-portrait influ­enced my own per­cep­tion of him over the years. Dis­tracted and lazy, I grad­u­ally bought the bogus propo­si­tion that by demon­strat­ing defin­i­tively that we do not live in a real democ­racy, Ralph Nader had done us wrong.

I’m now well over that. Ralph Nader isn’t a trai­tor to the left. (He isn’t tire­some or irrel­e­vant, either.) He’s a gen­uine Amer­i­can hero, right up there with Tom Paine. I was reminded of this recently by a May, 2010 address that Nader gave to pro­mote his lat­est book, a utopian “prac­ti­cal fan­tasy” called Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us!

This speech is an impas­sioned, informed, and inspir­ing piece of com­mon sense. And of course, being a speech by Nader, it’s a cry for orga­nized civic action. Tom Paine would be proud.

Leave a comment